The Supreme Court’s ruling should prompt neither triumphalism among bondholders nor defensiveness among regulators. It should trigger a serious reconsideration of AT-1’s economic rationale, the quality of bank supervision and the legal foundations of insolvency resolution.
More in Opinion
AI hype and dotcom déjà vu: Sorry to burst your bubble, but this doesn't look like one
October 22, 2026
Global slump: Why corporate capex in India is unlikely to rise just yet
October 22, 2026
Why the UPI MDR debate is about more than finding an acceptable transaction fee
October 22, 2026
India is within its rights to use duties others have weaponized against the Global South
October 22, 2026
Safety net cue: India may need to recraft public welfare for the age of artificial intelligence
October 22, 2026
Mint Quick Edit | SBI data breach: India’s AI efforts must make cybersecurity a priority
October 22, 2026
Latest News
‘MobLand’ EP Teases What Season 3 Holds for Tom Hardy as ‘Laird’ Star Peter Sarsgaard Shares How He Feels About Playing a “Malevolent U.S. Billionaire”
October 22, 2026
With ‘Phony,’ Nick Paley Poses a Horrifying Question — But Makes It Funny
October 22, 2026
Vrbo Coupon Codes: 40% Off | October 2026
October 22, 2026
‘Samurai Spirits’ Video Game Movie in the Works From ‘Altered Carbon’ Creator (Exclusive)
October 22, 2026
Former Eminem Staffer Pleads Guilty to Leaking Rapper’s Music
October 22, 2026
Where to Watch ‘Yaga’ Streaming Online for Free
October 22, 2026