Our basic understanding of core-collapse supernovae hasn’t changed in decades. Large stars burn through all the fuel at their cores and start creating heavier elements in reactions that consume energy. The lack of energy from these reactions allows gravity to pull the interior of the star in on itself, collapsing it into a neutron star or black hole. The energy released by this process then blows the remainder of the star apart.
And, generally, that’s right. But there’s an entire busload of devils in the details. The statistics of supernovae that we’ve observed indicate that the model may be seriously incomplete. And on the theoretical side, there are still plenty of uncertainties, including over some of the basics, such as whether all core collapses actually result in a supernova.
A paper being released by Physical Review D provides what might be a potential explanation for the discrepancy: flavor-changing neutrinos. Neutrinos play a key role in our current models of supernovae, and right now, those models don’t take into account one of neutrinos’ most striking features: their ability to change identity.
Your robotaxi might be a narc
September 17, 2026
Camp Snap’s 110D gives slim retro film cameras a digital upgrade
September 17, 2026
Lunacy Audio Nova is a place to build and sell your own AI-powered music plug-ins
September 17, 2026
AI is feared globally as the destroyer of jobs
September 17, 2026
Microsoft AI CEO says AI threats are real, and Anthropic is making it worse
September 17, 2026
Spotify’s Fresh Finds Forward gives artists free studio time and more
September 17, 2026
Leaden, stale, disheartening – where do Celtic & O'Neill go from here?
September 17, 2026