The Subhash Chandra personal-guarantee case under India’s Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) reminds us of the need to make fine distinctions that too many observers miss. For instance, an insolvency process cannot distribute what a guarantor’s estate does not contain.
More in Opinion
AI doomsaying: Why much of what’s being said about AI power is best taken with a pinch of salt
September 23, 2026
American media is setting an example by circling wagons against Trump’s punitive moves
September 23, 2026
Customs duty: India must reform its default payment process to minimize logistical delays
September 23, 2026
There may be a case to rebalance climate spending but the energy transition must go on
September 23, 2026
Investment research: ‘Buy’ and ‘sell’ are clear but what’s the point of the 'hold' rating awarded to stocks?
September 23, 2026
Why a unified compliance stack could unlock India’s startup potential
September 23, 2026
Latest News
Zelensky at UNGA: ‘Limit Putin's money. Limit his war’ — key takeaways from Ukraine president’s address
September 23, 2026
White House denies report of 90-day US diesel export ban
September 23, 2026
CDC Recognizes Measles Death After Pennsylvania Conflict
September 23, 2026
Barrecore and Boom Cycle owner suddenly shuts studios
September 23, 2026
Why is the price of protein powder rising?
September 23, 2026
CM congratulates badminton team after bronze medal win
September 23, 2026